Clipping of news on Brazilian Culture, Law and Citizenship
 


Several

Pranks on the evidence can eliminate candidates

01/28/2013

This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.

 


 




Questions are prepared by bunkers to confuse competitors until well prepared
Rio - In contests played much, it is common to rely banking organizer features like pranks on tests to eliminate candidates. Although the study is fundamental for approval, it is necessary that the candidate is also prepared for the questions that are designed to confuse you.
Karina Jaques, a professor at the Academy contest, says that in some cases, the main difficulty is not the content, but the wording of the question. "The questions evaluate reading comprehension more than the content."

Director of IOB Contests, Leonardo Pereira agrees and explains that the knowledge of Portuguese is essential to prevent the candidate falls into pranks. "One of the most common is to use the stalls morphosyntax to confuse the candidate in the interpretation of questions, both objective as essay. So who has good command of the language ends up having its outcome harmed, "he says.

ATTENTION TO DETAIL

For the teacher, it is essential that the candidate has to prove to attention. "The evidence of Cespe / UNB, for example, have set out with indirect speech, which confuses the candidate. The Carlos Chagas Foundation, in turn, has pranks on multiple choice questions. There are cases in which all options are correct, but only one is right in relation to the question, "he warns.

With the increased demand for public office, competitions become more crowded, and the stalls need to create ways to select candidates. "Thus, even the best prepared candidates are not immune to pranks, as they are made exactly to reach them," warns Leonardo Pereira.

ATTENTION TO CALL
The director of IOB Contests, Leonardo Pereira, warning that the candidate should read the notice carefully. "There are rules that if not followed, could hinder or preclude participation of the candidate."

OLD RACES
Another expert evidence is to old for the same job, the same committee.
"With this attitude, assessing official feedback and issues that were seen as certain, the candidate can even infer the line of doctrinal committee, which helps predict the gotchas", teaches.

 

Source: The Day - Online

Our news are removed entirely from the sites of our partners. For this reason, we can not change their content even in cases of typos.

This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.

Important:
The JurisWay site does not interfere in the work provided by doctrine, why only reflect the opinions, ideas and concepts of their authors.


  Subjects list
 
  Copyright (c) 2006-2009. JurisWay - All rights reserved.