Clipping of news on Brazilian Culture, Law and Citizenship
 


Consumer News

Anatel apply fines of R$ 13.6 million Embratel, Oi and CTBC for breach of the General Plan Quality

22/10/2012

This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.


 




Sanctions punish offenses committed by Embratel, Oi and CTBC.
 
The board of Anatel imposed a fine of R$ 8.3 million for breach Embratel to items of the General Plan Quality (PGMQ), as no supplementary flames, attending to repairs exceeding the established deadline and errors in collection service. The agency denied the administrative appeal submitted by the operator, but it is still possible to administratively appeal the decision.
The rapporteur of the matter, advisor Marcelo Bechara, disputed the claim that the operator presented on appeal, that the fine was disproportionate and unreasonable. Valente argued that the calculation of the penalty followed the standard practice at the time.

The board also approved the FCC fine of R$ 4.4 million for failing to Oi installation of public telephone in mining towns with more than 100 inhabitants. The agency did not accept the argument of the provider assign it to the population profile analysis of the areas in which it operates, since PGMU assume a duty dealerships periodically to monitor population profiles of each locality situated within its concession area.

The penalty was increased by 5% due to a history of the carrier. No more will an administrative decision.

It was also approved sanction CTBC, worth R$ 996,000, omission and negligent conduct by the operator, who would not have taken due care and possible fraudulent qualifications of telephone terminals, referring to three users, whose claims were considered by the originating call Anatel center. And also not to request termination of the contract, within 24 hours, damaging to 1962 users.

CTBC even asked the prescription process, opened in 2004, but was denied by the rapporteur of the matter, counsel Jarbas Valente, who said the process was underway in the period.
The dealership can still administratively appeal the decision.



Source: Telesíntese

Our news are removed entirely from the sites of our partners. For this reason, we can not change their content even in cases of typos.

This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.

Important:
The JurisWay site does not interfere in the work provided by doctrine, why only reflect the opinions, ideas and concepts of their authors.


  Subjects list
 
  Copyright (c) 2006-2009. JurisWay - All rights reserved.