Clipping of news on Brazilian Culture, Law and Citizenship
24/10/2012
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
In the last Enem, newsrooms were canceled 137,161, equivalent to 2.5% of total
Since 2009, when the Enem (National High School Exam) gained the status of vestibular, the number of canceled newsrooms is growing every year. The amount of text invalidated increased 168% between 2009 and 2011, against a growth of 59% in the number of corrected essays. Data Linked to changes in the rules of correction, with the various proposals for each edition of the essay examination and also the profile of applicants, experts say.
In the last Enem, the 2011 were canceled 137,161 essays - representing 2.5% of all people who have proof, counting those who gave blank. The State obtained the data of the last five editions of Enem through the Access to Information Act. The numbers were sent by Inep (National Institute for Educational Studies and Research), an agency of the MEC (Ministry of Education) responsible for Enem.
Comparing 2007 and 2011, the change in outlook is even greater. While the corrected text variation was 50%, the increase was nullified text in 661%. In 2007, only 18,030 texts were canceled. The number of essays submitted blank - which includes defaulters - grew 71.5% between 2007 and 2011.
For Inep, "the amount of essays marked" canceled / escape the theme "has a direct relationship to the subject of the proposed wording for each edition of Enem". But that does not explain everything. According to Professor Mauricio Kleinke, coordinator of vestibular Unicamp (University of Campinas), it was expected that as of 2009 there were more and more newsrooms canceled. The reason is the varied use of the exam.
Besides bone, the Enem began to be used after 2009 certification as high school and adult education (Youth and Adult). In addition to the criteria for scholarships ProUni (University for All Program) and student finance.
- The Enem began to be more sought after by people who are away from the educational system.
In the last Enem, 46% of those enrolled were older than 21 years. The teacher points out that the economic reality is preponderant in writing for performance.
- The Enem caters to a very varied.
This range of uses is reflected in the rules for the correction of proof, especially in text size. The candidate who write eight lines already guarantees the right to note - if you do not disrespect other criteria. Besides not below the minimum, a candidate will have zero escape if the proposed topic, write insults, drawings or other forms of deliberate nullification or not based on the structure of argumentative text dissertative.
Correction
Retired Professor of Humanities at UNESP (Universidade Estadual Paulista), Rogério Chociay argues that the criteria has Enem correction varied for each candidate profile.
- Do not take away the unpreparedness of brokers, but the lack of quality of the texts is the most responsible for cancellations. Graduates who have different performance left the EJA.
Chociay is a caveat: the percentage of cancellations, despite having grown up, is low. Kleinke, Unicamp, agrees. Former president Joao Batista Gomes Neto Inep goes further and says that the figures expose the failures of the school.
- The problem of education in Brazil is very serious. And within that problem, the writing is the most serious, because people can not write.
Rigor
In the latest edition of Enem, MEC had promoted change in the criteria of writing, with decreasing discrepancy between the first two notes brokers so that the text had new fix. For the next edition, new change: further decreased the discrepancy now for 200 points. There is also a limit difference in each of the five skills assessed.
Source: MEC
Our news are removed entirely from the sites of our partners. For this reason, we can not change their content even in cases of typos.
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.