24/08/2012
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
Emilia Ribeiro counselor's suggestion was accepted, despite the contrary position of director Rodrigo Zerbone.
Despite having already decided that the values corresponding to repair damage from unidentified customers must be deposited in the Fund for the Defense of Direct Diffuse (FDD), the subject is still controversial in Anatel. At the board meeting this Thursday (23), the counselor asked Emilia Ribeiro view all lawsuits against operators that provided background to the gathering, understanding that lack of a standard procedure to guide decisions.
The counselor advocates standardization of calculation that must be deposited to the FDD, the term that will be given to operators to meet the obligation and even the form of notification to violators. She suggested that standardization could be given through meeting between the counselors' offices, technical area and prosecutor without need for formal regulation.
Councilor Rodrigo Zerbone thought it unnecessary to establish criteria, since the amounts to be deposited to the FDD, which is managed by the Ministry of Justice, the processes are easily identified. But his argument was overthrown, since the other board members approved the recommendation of Emilia.
Source: The Day Online
Our news are removed entirely from the sites of our partners. For this reason, we can not change their content even in cases of typos.
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.