Anatel: rules for TV extra point not valid
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
The new rules for TV's signature, approved last week by the National Telecommunications Agency (Anatel), which prohibited the collection by extra point, were published today in the Journal of the EU's ban, however, is not worth continuing because force of an injunction in Federal Court in Brasilia in June last year, allowing the collection.
The Federal Court, according to press his office is awaiting official notification of the decision of Anatel on the extra point of the free to decide whether or not repealing the injunction. The advice from Anatel said that the Attorney-General of the agency is awaiting the conclusion of the votes of the directors and the minutes of the meeting at which the matter was voted, last Thursday, to communicate the decision to the Judge.
The understanding of Anatel, shown on the notice of the decision, the injunction is that the lost object, and therefore should be repealed. In deciding on action brought by the Brazilian Association of pay TV (ABTA), the judge Luiz Roberto Luchi Demo granted the injunction until the Anatel clarify what could be charged on the extra point.
Last week, ten months after the court injunction, Anatel decided to prohibit the charging of a fee by the extra point, but allowed the operators cover the installation of additional point and the repair of defects, where possible.
By the rules, the recovery rate of installation and repairs may be divided into parts, depending on the accuracy between customer and operator. Also according to Anatel, the companies can not retroactively charge the decoder is already installed in the customer's home.
The ABTA today released a press release stating that the Anatel will present a request for reconsideration of the decision and said it may adopt other measures "to preserve the normal operations of its affiliates until the outcome of this matter."
Source: State Agency
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
Important:
The JurisWay site does not interfere in the work provided by doctrine, why only reflect the opinions, ideas and concepts of their authors.
