Law antifumo divided opinions in SP
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
The adoption of the law antifumo by the Legislative Assembly of São Paulo has divided opinions and leads discussions, especially in pubs in the capital. It is these institutions that the smoker becomes important layer in the client portfolio and is received with open arms. In general, people think the law will take, but it is far from a unanimous vote. Some people understand that smoking is bad, but kills less than transit.
The law of zero tolerance to smoking - and derivatives such as cigars or pipes - in places of collective use was approved on the evening of Tuesday (7). The project will be sent to Governor Jose Serra, who shall sanction and regulate the law. He has 10 days to make penalty. After that, the time of entry into force is 90 days.
The G1 has a few bars, to record the first impressions of smokers and non-smokers. This is not a science, however, is to understand how some of the people will behave going forward.
"Drunk driving is more dangerous'
"Traffic kills more than smoking," warns Antonio Miranda, 28 years. Smoker, he is not against the new measure. However, he says the government should worry about more important matters. "To not harm anyone, I agree that not smoking indoors. But think before you take the foot of the smoker should be, for example, better monitor traffic. A drunk-driving is more dangerous than a smoker, "he says.
The coordinator of trade André Barros, 27, said a bad language to know the content of the new law that is coming. Then he promised that it will avoid places where smoking is prohibited. "Leave to attend these places," said. "If it is not prohibited selling cigarettes in a bar, I have the right to smoke in that bar. The guy can not sell something that I can not consume that same time, "complains.
The British TV producer and Polly, 29, is already accustomed to the climate that will be created in São Paulo soon, and like. She recalled that in London the cigarette was banned from public places in 2007. "Some pubs closed, but people are accustomed and life continued. Other places allow you to leave the establishment, and smoke again. But inside, it was a better environment, "said.
'The profit will fall'
Socio-owner of a bar at the Avenida Paulista, Alexander Lamb, of 46 years, provides that establishments will record drop in the movement in the first month after the law comes into force. "The profit will fall. Bars will close, "warned. Your first step will be cut from the cigarette shelves and stop selling the packs which sells almost 1,000 a month. "In addition to being low income, I can not offer something that is forbidden in my own trade," he said.
According to Lamb, a more intelligent that the government reduce the number of smokers is to move them in your pocket. "Raising the price of cigarettes work faster. Put a pack to $ 10.00, "suggested.
The trader said that never
complaints received by enabling people to smoke in his bar. "Almost everybody here smokes. It is the profile of who attends the bars of Sao Paulo. "
Lamb noted that the prohibition, scary in the beginning because of their penalties, customers' habits changed only at the beginning of the new transit legislation. And that can occur with the law antifumo also, he says. "If you drink the same as before and people continue driving. The audit disappeared and accidents still occur. Will push the smokers and dealers now, but then will find a way to enjoy the bar worldwide.
Law antifumo
The cigarette will be banned in bars, restaurants and workplaces. You can not even in fumódromos. Smokers may not smoke in any enclosed or partially enclosed environment that collective use of public or private. It will only be allowed to smoke at home, in shops specializing in the sale of cigarettes and the like, as tobacconists, and religious cults in which the tobacco is part of the ritual.
According to this law passed Tuesday, the entrepreneur will be subject to penalties silent under Article 56 of the Consumer Defense Code (Law 8078/1990), applicable in the form of Articles 57 to 60. Article 57 of the Consumer Defense Code states that "the fine is an amount not less than two hundred and not more than three million times the value of the Fiscal Reference Unit (Ufir) or equivalent index that will replace it" .
The chairman of the House Barros Munhoz (PSDB) said that the possible penalties are defined in the rules of law.
Source: G1
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
Important:
The JurisWay site does not interfere in the work provided by doctrine, why only reflect the opinions, ideas and concepts of their authors.
