Reassessment of pesticides: 10 years of protecting the population
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
By: Gladys Magalhães Ferraz
SÃO PAULO - On a scale of zero to 10, the system of consortia received note 7.69, when evaluated as an investment that helps people plan for the future, behind only the buildings, which note was 9.37.
The data is part of a study requested by Abaca (Brazilian Association of Administrators of consortia) to Quorum Brazil, entitled Study of Scenarios and Opportunities on the participants and potential customers in the industry.
The notes were given for not participating in consortia, which have examined other forms of investment as the ability to assist in future planning, assigning these notes the following: private pension plans (7.59), financial application (7.06), saving (7.05) and action (6.35).
When judged by who is already part of a group of consortium, the sector received 8.67 note.
Pros and cons
The survey also found how the system is understood both by customers and by non-customers. In general, the main association people make with the word consortia is an investment in time, which took 23% of responses.
Then is seen as a way to buy a car (13%) or to secure the future building (9%). Facility to acquire a property (7%), savings in the long term (6%), obtaining goods in the long term (5%) and how to purchase goods (4%) were other views that the respondents have the system, finally is considered as a purchase installments, without having the money on time, service, 3% of the ears.
Furthermore, approximately 17% of potential customers and clients have 5% of negative evaluations of the system. On average, between consumers and non-users, the delay in having the property was cited for 5% of persons interviewed, many benefits and a synonym of a headache received, each, 3% of the entries.
Disappointed by the delay of delivery of goods, lack of transparency and commitment also brought the memory of the consumer, with 1% of mentions each. The Abaca remember that the answers were spontaneous, and they only released those with large number of entries.
Source: Infomoney
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
Important:
The JurisWay site does not interfere in the work provided by doctrine, why only reflect the opinions, ideas and concepts of their authors.
