Clipping of news on Brazilian Culture, Law and Citizenship
08/12/2016
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
transparent image
The 1st Chamber of Civil Law considered exclusive of the victim blames debts arising card theft and bank password. She entered the password in front of continuous, who had bought Christmas balls and who effected purchases as payment. Minutes after revealed the combination, the teenager holding a woman's purse as a favor, stole the card and began to perform expenses for four days, until the lock.
"If, as confessed by the appellant, the smallest who removed his card was his name, he was with the applicant and had knowledge of the password at the time held together shopping," registered Judge Saul Steil, rapporteur of the matter. Moreover, "it is noted that the author claimed to have left his bag with his belongings with the lowest," he said.
The author argued that the bank should reimburse the expenses of R $ 10,800. The camera however pointed out that, for financial operations have been made, it was necessary to have full knowledge of the personal password, which would be impossible to achieve except through its own account holder. Thus, scored the magistrates, the authors emphasize the exclusive fault of the victim. The decision was unanimous (Appeal n. 0000350-05.2014.8.24.0082).
Photos: Morguefil
Source: TJSC
Our news are taken in full of our partner sites. For this reason, we can not change their content even in cases of typographical errors.
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.