Clipping of news on Brazilian Culture, Law and Citizenship
by Danilo Santana - Brazilian Writer
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
The popular event is one of the most beautiful and honored to political democracy, moreover, many of the great world leaders have arisen because of their ability to organize and support grassroots movements successfully.
The movements can be manifested in several ways, by means of periodic meetings, promoting the concentration of supporters of a certain political philosophy; edition of manifest public rejection or approval of acts, events, personalities or authorities and, among many others, by formal association of people with the goal of adding resources, strengths and experience to achieve a particular project.
Political parties should be, in effect, the natural shelter of sectors of society who share the same ideals and, consequently, the battlefield for the proposal or defense of their position, course, should reach its apex in the courts of parliaments.
The presence of people in the streets, in the auditorium and the tables of negotiation of a peaceful and civilized, is an achievement itself, without return, and should be a source of pride for every citizen, even if their convictions are contrary to the objectives expressed in these events.
Because this is the most eloquent sign of democracy, civility and citizenship, in addition to the embryo to be aware that the final, ensures the strength of moral freedom and sovereignty of a nation.
But for the popular movements are not lost in its essence and become demonstration of force and acts of savagery policy, must be exercised within the deepest respect for the laws in force and without taking any damage, danger or discomfort to the other citizens outside events and goals of the group.
The reasoning that people outside the movement should not be plagued if necessary clarify it, is, obviously, in the simplest of individual rights: to be involved or victimized by ideals to which no interest to join or simply you are indifferent. After all, this is one of the most legitimate of human freedom and can not be ignored by anyone.
Another legal institution, the more legitimate that only recently Brazil has adopted and fully legalized, the right to strike. Nothing could be more fair and appropriate that the work force by deliberate ostentation of his political power and economic and paralyze the activities of production as a way to be heard and respected the power of capital.
It is logical that the fruits of these popular movements, primarily politicians, may take some time to consolidate itself and produce practical purposes, therefore, some leaders failed to resolve to join groups and make baderneiros public acts and provocations, often criminals, as a way to draw the attention of the media and capitalize benefits fast.
The most serious is that this way of expressing already spreads and even the workers, who may not have to participate in that strike means illegitimate, improper or inappropriate, they are beaten by the practitioners of baderna exclusive contract to do "happens to strike."
If you were to admit the use of violence or disregard of the rights of other citizens meet in front of a clear civil war, because wars only on the general rules of law are suspended. However, for outbreak of armed conflict and violent, that people simply contrary to the philosophy of demonstrators respond to attacks with the same weapons and the same ignorance and savagery.
These pseudo protesters, real marginal, often damaging public property, invade private property, looting shops, hits people who refuse to participate in their acts of vandalism and they want to impose their will by force.
These attitudes, in the field of psychology and psychiatry, no more represent the eruption of the sense of inability to build, which stimulates the cowards and the morally sick, causing the destruction and aggression to the general rules of social conduct, as a valve Escape to hide his disability policy.
So you can not raise the category of Popular Movements the invasions to private property, the looting of supermarkets or destruction of monuments and national symbols, attitudes which, of course, are acts in the Penal Code concerns and whose responsibility should receive the treatment accorded to gangs of bandits, they militate against the soundness of democracy in frank apology to anarchy, and stimulate and support a form of organized crime.
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.