Clipping of news on Brazilian Culture, Law and Citizenship
 


Several

Dilma vetoes bill that reduced domestic contribution to the INSS

10/12/2014

This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.

 

 



transparent image


Proposal had been approved in November by the House of Representatives.
Text suggested that employers and employees to begin to pay 6% of INSS.
 
President Dilma Rousseff fully vetoed the bill that reduced to 6% social security contribution rate of employers and domestic workers to the National Social Security Institute (INSS). The decision of the Chief Executive was published in this Tuesday (9) the "Official Gazette".

The proposal vetoed by Dilma, authored by former Senator Serys Slhessarenko (PT-MT), was approved in November by the House of Representatives. However, this theme is also being discussed by the Joint Committee of Congress in charge of regulating the PEC of Home.

The payment of the INSS is a must both for employers and for employees, but the current law says that each side has to pay a different rate.

The text vetoed on Monday (8) suggested a reduction from 12% to 6% of the current percentage paid by employers to social security of home. The proposal also provided that employees who currently collect between 8% and 11%, passed to contribute to the INSS a fixed rate of 6%. The project also created an exclusive guide to the payment of social security contributions.

In justifying its decision to Congress, Dilma claimed that the ministries of Finance and Social Security defended the veto because of the bill have been filed before the PEC of Home, which was enacted in April 2013 and presented in 2010.

The text Serys Slhessarenko was filed in the Senate in April 2009. The following year, passed the Senate, but it was only voted by MPs last month.
According to the President, at this time, lawmakers are regulating, "full and more properly," changes in work rules of domestic workers proposed by the constitutional amendment.

In addition, Dilma noted that the possible penalty of the bill would generate an annual negative impact of R $ 600 million in the Union's finances. The chief executive said in justifying the veto that such tax relief is not "consistent with the current economic times ".
 
President Dilma Rousseff fully vetoed the bill that reduced to 6% social security contribution rate of employers and domestic workers to the National Social Security Institute (INSS). The decision of the Chief Executive was published in this Tuesday (9) the "Official Gazette".

The proposal vetoed by Dilma, authored by former Senator Serys Slhessarenko (PT-MT), was approved in November by the House of Representatives. However, this theme is also being discussed by the Joint Committee of Congress in charge of regulating the PEC of Home.

The payment of the INSS is a must both for employers and for employees, but the current law says that each side has to pay a different rate.

The text vetoed on Monday (8) suggested a reduction from 12% to 6% of the current percentage paid by employers to social security of home. The proposal also provided that employees who currently collect between 8% and 11%, passed to contribute to the INSS a fixed rate of 6%. The project also created an exclusive guide to the payment of social security contributions.

In justifying its decision to Congress, Dilma claimed that the ministries of Finance and Social Security defended the veto because of the bill have been filed before the PEC of Home, which was enacted in April 2013 and presented in 2010.

The text Serys Slhessarenko was filed in the Senate in April 2009. The following year, passed the Senate, but it was only voted by MPs last month.
According to the President, at this time, lawmakers are regulating, "full and more properly," changes in work rules of domestic workers proposed by the constitutional amendment.

In addition, Dilma noted that the possible penalty of the bill would generate an annual negative impact of R $ 600 million in the Union's finances. The chief executive said in justifying the veto that such tax relief is not "consistent with the current economic times ".


Source: G1

Our news are taken in full of our partner sites. For this reason, we can not change their content even in cases of typos.

This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.

Important:
The JurisWay site does not interfere in the work provided by doctrine, why only reflect the opinions, ideas and concepts of their authors.


  Subjects list
 
  Copyright (c) 2006-2009. JurisWay - All rights reserved.