Clipping of news on Brazilian Culture, Law and Citizenship
22/05/2013
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
Rio de Janeiro - A Public Defender Union in Rio de Janeiro (DPU / RJ) filed a civil action in the 4 th Federal Court to try to ensure the candidate's National Secondary Education Examination (Enem) 2013 the right to request a review of proof writing.
According to the current rules set out in the announcement of the examination, there is no possibility of appeal request after the disclosure of the notes. Because of the Regulation, DPU requires the Ministry of Education (MEC) to create an instrument that enables the re-evaluation of the candidate's writing, before the opening of registration for the Unified Selection System (Sisu) - when the student opts for university at a date not set. The race will take place between 26 and 27 October this year.
The lawsuit filed yesterday (20), has as defendants the Union and the National Institute of Education and Research Teixeira (Inep). According to the announcement of the Enem, there is no scope for the candidate to contest your grade. The candidate can only view the correction of your text via internet.
In 2012, approximately 30 students resorted to court to ask for reassessment of the evidence, but none succeeded. The federal public defender Daniel Macedo, plaintiff said today (21), Brazil Agency that "the voluntary appeal mechanism is essential to control the result of correction. No one better than the candidate to signal the misconception of the broker and, therefore, seek to obtain the actual note. Today there are 5,500 brokers, for an increasing number of applicants for the vacancy, lack transparency in the system, "he said.
In August 2011, the National Institute for Educational Studies Teixeira (Inep) and federal prosecutors signed a Terms of Adjustment of Conduct (TAC) in which the MEC undertook to grant a "pedagogical view" the evidence as a right of candidates. For this instrument, the student will have access to mirror the wording corrected, but there is an option to request a review of correction.
About TAC, the public defender questions the evaluation because it is not based on an administrative appeal. "Taking into consideration that each essay has a maximum of 30 lines, with five topics to be evaluated, each with five items, there is no guarantee or conditions to ensure correct quality or minimally uniform, as well as a satisfactory evaluation "he said.
Public action filed by DPU is also based on identified gaps in the correction of proofs, as the case of the student who scored a 560 even after writing a recipe for noodles in proof writing, and errors of agreement and spelling. As a result, the Minister of Education, Mercadante announced stricter measures to correct the essays, requiring teachers justifications for each note in the maximum Enem this year.
Inep said in a statement that it was not notified, but when it will turn. "In 2011 was signed a Term of Conduct Adjustment by the Ministry of Education with federal prosecutors, according to which the MEC has agreed to release the evidence to writing pedagogical view. TAC established that from Enem 2012 would be made feasible right to view the evidence of all participants, with features crafts, as a merely teaching, following the disclosure of the results. "
The Public Defender Union created an email address for any complaints and complaints relating to evidence Enem: enem@dpu.gov.br
Edition: Aecio Amado
All content on this website is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Brazil. You just need to give credit to the Agency Brazil
Source: Agencia Brazil
Our news are taken in full from our partner sites. For this reason, we can not change the contents of the same even in cases of typos.
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.