Clipping of news on Brazilian Culture, Law and Citizenship
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.
With the economic and social development of large urban centers a need that was evident is the ease of displacement by the population, the mobility became a marked element of urban development. Such mobility occurs in the majority by the Office of Urban Public Transport, which tends to allow the displacement of population to various regions, with appropriate flexibility conditions of each individual and each major center.
Since the constant evolution and the number of public transport users supporters growing, obviously we have to increase the operational cost of the service being provided, requiring investments that are passed to the user in the form of a price, which is the price charged to the user by the transport service performed. To this collection were created methods for calculating the value of fees to be passed to people. One of these methods is used to calculate the administrative cost of the companies, the lower the amount spent, therefore, the lower the fare paid by the population.
The pricing spreadsheet, which is the means which define the cost of the tariff for users always generates discussion, since the administrative costs are higher every day to operators, who are compelled to always perform searches tireless in trying to decrease, making the use of technology management for effective control of users who have benefit, aimed at avoidance of revenue.
This drop in between arm model of pay rates and employment of new technologies, efficient management mechanism, is the discussion on the legality of the means of management, in terms of the capture and use easy recognition (biometrics) to certify who are the users who does not justify the benefit of exemption of tariff (transition charge as a function of age, for example) at the time of transposition of the turnstile of vehicles available for carrying out transmission.
In section X of Article 5 of the Federal Constitution provides that all are equal before the law is inviolable and the intimacy, the private life, honor and image, the right to compensation for material or moral damage arising from your violation.
However, the art. 20 of the Civil Code (Law 10406/2002) recommends that when authorized or necessary to the administration of justice, the use of the image of a person may be used without prejudice to the claims that fit.
Based on constitutional principles and constitutional infrastructure, besides the customs which has enable the principle of equality, the use of technologies, including the recognition Easy, aims to balance the pricing model currently combalido, is increasingly necessary, because "no can those fair, pay for those who defraud the system. "
Like all innovation comes sheathed in discussions and the theme is addressed fairly new, the result of technological developments, is not always accompanied by specific rules in the legislation. However, even though they have specific rules on the subject in Brazil, which does not mean that relevant obligations exist for companies interested in using the technology Easy Recognition oriented management and control of users of public transport, we can say that usability does not break the established legal precept in item 5 of Article X of the Brazilian Federal Constitution and some laws Infrastructure constitutional, since such control and management are to ensure the maintenance of public order, to avoid problems and doubts about the applicability, the User must authorize through legal means the registration of the image, as a rule, be brought forward to permit the user to use the system to easily recognize when to use public transport, thus permanently removing any doubts about the legality of the process
This article was translated by an automatic translation system, and was therefore not reviewed by people.